Fast Monte Carlo Bermudan Greeks

In recent years, much effort has been devoted to improving the efficiency of the Libor market model. Matthias Leclerc, Qian Liang and Ingo Schneider extend the pioneering work of Giles & Glasserman (2006) and show how fast calculations of Monte Carlo Greeks are feasible even within the framework of Bermudan-style derivatives. The authors demonstrate the efficiency gains in detail

Fast pricing and calculating hedging parameters are still a challenge in the framework of the Libor market model (LMM), which has become the fundamental pricing model in the fixed-income environment. Traditionally, for fixed-income securities, Greeks are calculated by the so-called bump and revalue method: each initial forward rate is perturbed by a basis-point shift and then the security is valued again. Besides the simplicity, there is no further advantage. The LMM is usually implemented with Monte Carlo methods and this can be rather slow, especially using the perturbation described before. The simulation procedure in the LMM is done in a forward measure and so the natural way to calculate Greeks is to do them on the fly. Giles & Glasserman (2006) have shown that under specific circumstances, their adjoint method can be suitable to get the Greeks a lot faster and save a considerable amount of computation time.

The rest of this article is structured as follows. We describe the dynamics of the LMM and fix notations. We review the basic forward calculations of pathwise Greeks (delta and vega) and then describe the fundamental principles of the adjoint method, both for European-style derivatives only. Next, we describe how the usual forward framework can be extended to value Bermudan options: after a forward procedure we need to work backwards to calculate the optimal exercise times. Based on this idea, we develop the modifications necessary for the adjoint method. Numerical applications demonstrate the extended adjoint method. Interestingly, both adjoint extensions are based on the originally developed pathwise forward method.

Matthias Leclerc is executive director at Value&Risk, Frankfurt and professor of mathematics at the University of Augsburg. Qian Liang is a graduate student in mathematics at the University of Kaiserslautern & Fraunhofer ITWM. Ingo Schneider is head of financial engineering at DekaBank. The result of this article is based on the diploma thesis of the second author at the University of Augsburg. Email: ingo.schneider@deka.de

Interest Rates (PDF)

REFERENCES

Brace A, D Gatarek and M Musiela, 1997

The market model of interest rate dynamics

Mathematical Finance 7, pages 127-155

Brigo D and F Mercurio, 2001

Interest rate models, theory and practice

Springer Verlag

Giles M and P Glasserman, 2006

Smoking adjoints: fast Monte Carlo Greeks

Risk January, pages 88-92

Glasserman P, 2004

Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering

Springer Verlag

Glasserman P and X Zhao, 1999

Fast Greeks by simulation in forward Libor models

Journal of Computational Finance 3, pages 5-39

Jamshidian F, 1997

Libor and swap market models and measures

Finance and Stochastics 1, pages 293-330

Longstaff F and E Schwartz, 2001

Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach

Review of Financial Studies 14, pages 113-147

Piterbarg V, 2004

Computing deltas of callable Libor exotics in forward Libor models

Journal of Computational Finance 7(3), pages 107-144.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here