Fast Monte Carlo Bermudan Greeks
In recent years, much effort has been devoted to improving the efficiency of the Libor market model. Matthias Leclerc, Qian Liang and Ingo Schneider extend the pioneering work of Giles & Glasserman (2006) and show how fast calculations of Monte Carlo Greeks are feasible even within the framework of Bermudan-style derivatives. The authors demonstrate the efficiency gains in detail
Fast pricing and calculating hedging parameters are still a challenge in the framework of the Libor market model (LMM), which has become the fundamental pricing model in the fixed-income environment. Traditionally, for fixed-income securities, Greeks are calculated by the so-called bump and revalue method: each initial forward rate is perturbed by a basis-point shift and then the security is valued again. Besides the simplicity, there is no further advantage. The LMM is usually implemented with Monte Carlo methods and this can be rather slow, especially using the perturbation described before. The simulation procedure in the LMM is done in a forward measure and so the natural way to calculate Greeks is to do them on the fly. Giles & Glasserman (2006) have shown that under specific circumstances, their adjoint method can be suitable to get the Greeks a lot faster and save a considerable amount of computation time.
The rest of this article is structured as follows. We describe the dynamics of the LMM and fix notations. We review the basic forward calculations of pathwise Greeks (delta and vega) and then describe the fundamental principles of the adjoint method, both for European-style derivatives only. Next, we describe how the usual forward framework can be extended to value Bermudan options: after a forward procedure we need to work backwards to calculate the optimal exercise times. Based on this idea, we develop the modifications necessary for the adjoint method. Numerical applications demonstrate the extended adjoint method. Interestingly, both adjoint extensions are based on the originally developed pathwise forward method.
Matthias Leclerc is executive director at Value&Risk, Frankfurt and professor of mathematics at the University of Augsburg. Qian Liang is a graduate student in mathematics at the University of Kaiserslautern & Fraunhofer ITWM. Ingo Schneider is head of financial engineering at DekaBank. The result of this article is based on the diploma thesis of the second author at the University of Augsburg. Email: ingo.schneider@deka.de
Interest Rates (PDF)REFERENCES
Brace A, D Gatarek and M Musiela, 1997
The market model of interest rate dynamics
Mathematical Finance 7, pages 127-155
Brigo D and F Mercurio, 2001
Interest rate models, theory and practice
Springer Verlag
Giles M and P Glasserman, 2006
Smoking adjoints: fast Monte Carlo Greeks
Risk January, pages 88-92
Glasserman P, 2004
Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering
Springer Verlag
Glasserman P and X Zhao, 1999
Fast Greeks by simulation in forward Libor models
Journal of Computational Finance 3, pages 5-39
Jamshidian F, 1997
Libor and swap market models and measures
Finance and Stochastics 1, pages 293-330
Longstaff F and E Schwartz, 2001
Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach
Review of Financial Studies 14, pages 113-147
Piterbarg V, 2004
Computing deltas of callable Libor exotics in forward Libor models
Journal of Computational Finance 7(3), pages 107-144.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk