ABA sets up new op risk committee
The American Bankers Association (ABA) has created a new operating risk committee to help bankers reduce losses and comply with new capital requirements laid out in Basel II, the new regulatory capital accord being devised by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
The timeframe should give participating banks three years of benchmark data ahead of the introduction of Basel II, expected in late 2006. The risk-based Basel II capital accord will require internationally active banks to ensure they are fully protected against operational risks for the first time.
“The ABA has a proven record of confidential data collection and analysis in areas such as cheque fraud,” said Robert Jones, director of op risk management at FleetBoston Financial, who will chair the ABA operating risk committee. “Better data will help banks develop better strategies to reduce losses, and will help banks develop more efficient methods for determining their capital reserves.”
The ABA move comes as Charles Taylor was made director of operational risk at the 88-year-old Risk Management Association (RMA). Based in Philadelphia, the 3,000 member RMA caters primarily to US commercial banks, community banks and some global investment banks (see: US Risk Management Association appoints new operational risk head).
Founding members of the ABA’s op risk committee are: Bank of America, BB&T, Comerica, First Tennessee, FleetBoston, Hibernia, Key Bank, National City, Wachovia and Zions.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure