EU report makes case for a pan-European regulation
Daily news headlines
New study called for into the economic effects of the FSAP
A new European Parliament report has called for a series of new studies into the economic effects of Financial Services Action Plan (FSAP), which also makes a case for the creating a European supervisory authority for the supervision of large cross-border firms.The success of the FSAP is praised in the report as being a major contributor to delivering an integrated and well functioning European capital market but there are some concerns that this success may cause other potential pitfalls that need to be addressed. The report requests the Commission to commission a series of studies to examine the economic effects of the FSAP at the same time as it conducts its annual progress reports and implementation monitors.One of the main questions the report raises is whether there is sufficient competition at the top end of the market. Whilst the high level of market consolidation in the European financial services sector is not a problem in itself, it could lead to problems if the implementation of EU competition law is not as vigorous as it should be. The report therefore urges the Commission to conduct a more in-depth economic impact studies and to ensure EC competition rules are enforced. The rise of private equity and hedge funds are another prominent concern in the draft report. The EU is concerned that the extent to which these types of firms have increased leverage and debt ratios in major EU companies may lead to a systemic risk and warrant further discussion about regulation of these firms – a motion Commissioner McCreevy’s has resisted. But it is the section on regulation and supervisory architecture that makes the most controversial suggestion of a European regulator. In this new and dynamic financial market, the report warns that a new regulatory supervisory framework may be required to keep pace with the rapidly changing financial world. Although the report praises the work of the Level 3 Committees, the present system is described as ‘too weak’ to secure efficient conduct of business supervision and a case is made for a ‘well equipped executive European prudential supervisory authority …endowed with the appropriate competences for supervision of large cross-border and cross-sector financial conglomerates’. The report notes that this suggestion will not be greeted favourably by most member states but it emphasises that participating in a central system would give smaller regulators greater influence than they currently have. Should the suggestion for a new study of the FSAP be taken up, the debate over the creation of a central EU regulator will raise its ugly head again and no doubt there will be some very interesting statements from the larger EU members.Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Beware war exclusions in cyber insurance, risk managers told
Risk Live: Experts say policy wording is tightening up following rise in ransomware attacks
Top 10 operational risks for 2024
The biggest op risks for the year ahead, as chosen by senior industry practitioners
Top 10 op risks: AI fears drive cyber risk to record high
External fraud re-enters top 10; change management now a top five concern
Harsh judgements: why Stateside lenders are upping the Q-factor
As CRE stalls, qualitative adjustments are forming a larger part of US banks’ credit risk allowances
As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk
Panellists highlight dangers of clearing membership becoming more concentrated
Bank credit risk: how well do you know your counterparties?
As financial markets evolve, evaluating the complex credit risk exposures of non-bank counterparties is crucial for effective risk management, says Quantifi’s Dmitry Pugachevsky
EU index managers face funding risks as US moves to T+1
Rotations from European to US assets will need prefunding due to slower EU settlement
CCPs show support for daily stress margin tools
Anti-procyclicality measure floated by HKEX official sparks interest from rivals including Nasdaq
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk
- Top 10 op risks: AI fears drive cyber risk to record high