SEPA clarification welcomed
European Payments Council issues clarification of Sepa payment cards scheme
BRUSSELS – The European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) have welcomed further clarification from the European Payments Council (EPC), the association of banks and banking associations that is setting up the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa).
In the document, published in question-and-answer format, the EPC clarifies key aspects of compliance with the Sepa Cards Framework (SCF) for payment card schemes and banks, as well as the conditions for geographical coverage of card schemes within the Sepa. It hopes this will facilitate the transition from the existing fragmented and monopolistic national payments markets towards a competitive, Sepa-wide, payment cards market.
The Sepa is a unique initiative of the European banking industry to move from 31 national payment systems towards an integrated euro payments area. Once Sepa is a reality, Europeans will be able to make payments and cash withdrawals in euros throughout the Sepa area as easily as in their home country.
One of the most pressing issues concerns the rules for migration of cards to Sepa. Unlike the comprehensive rulebooks for credit transfers and direct debits, the SCF does not outline any detailed rules and standards, but rather describes three options for attaining Sepa compliance. Market participants seemed to interpret these three options in a way that meant a card scheme is only SCF compliant if it covers all 31 states of the Sepa territory.
The European Commission and the ECB are satisfied by the EPC’s confirmation that – in the context of geographical coverage – compliance with the SCF only requires that cards be technically and commercially capable of being accepted everywhere in the Sepa territory. Therefore, any scheme, even an efficient national scheme, will be able to become SCF compliant, provided that – among other requirements – it is technically and commercially capable of admitting banks from other Sepa countries.
Click here to access the paper
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites