Risk Management After Lehman

Can the constants used by quants and risk managers be trusted in the post-Lehman environment? Chris Schlegel of Southern Company looks at some of the pitfalls risk managers need to look out for when using constants and assesses why they are both vitally important, but equally ill-behaved if not used with care

ist-4641119-moneytrap

For all who thought it was money that makes the world go ‘round, bad news: it is in fact constants. Not the respectably stable constants like gravity, but that whole crew of potentially ill-behaved hooligans that need to be carefully estimated to make applied finance possible: volatility, jumps, correlations, and the like. Look deep enough into any risk model, there they are.

The billion-dollar question for us is do we still trust them, after Lehman, AIG, and a swing in basic commodity prices

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here