Editor's letter
As Credit went to press, the US House of Representatives was due to vote a second time on the proposed bail-out for banks holding assets they are unable to value or sell. While it is easy to sympathise with the view that this kind of intervention is socialism for banks or Main St rescuing Wall St, politicians - and voters - must remember that much more is at stake than the fortunes of the banks. Businesses rely on credit facilities obtained from financial institutions to pay their liabilities, the most costly of which tends to be payroll.
There's been speculation about when the financial system's woes will feed through into the 'real economy'. If the bail-out or a swiftly executed successor plan doesn't succeed, the answer to that question will be 'very soon' and redundancies will result.
We should also emphasise that the plan before Congress doesn't amount to a 'get out of jail free' card. We don't know what level will be set for the assets concerned, but it's likely that some banks will be forced to make further writedowns. Some will fail.
What's clear is that the market alone has failed to agree on a bottoming out and without that the system - and soon enough economies throughout the world - will remain paralysed. It's useless to speculate about the US government's chances of making money by holding currently distressed assets to maturity - there are no winners among the parties trying to make this deal work. But if it isn't allowed to go through, we'll all be losers.
Matthew Attwood.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules that were originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management