Libor, ring-fencing and the Risk Awards

The week on Risk.net, January 22–28, 2016

clock

LIBOR is in the headlines once again as the issue of replacing the benchmark causes trouble

RING-FENCING is causing more headaches as banks grow impatient for final rules

THE RISK AWARDS recognise derivatives excellence at Citi, BlackRock, Citadel and others


COMMENTARY: Libor's legacy

This week, six interdealer brokers on trial in London were acquitted of crimes related to the Libor-rigging scandal. The men were accused of conspiring with convicted UBS trader Tom Hayes, who was imprisoned last year, but the jury cleared them of all charges of conspiracy. Elsewhere, though, the aftershocks of the Libor scandal continue to rumble.

Moves to replace Libor with another unsecured benchmark rate such as Eonia have hit a pothole, with the news that volumes have dropped so low in the unsecured money markets that the Eonia rate is now highly volatile and "almost meaningless", according to Eurex. A revised Eonia methodology is one possible solution, as is using a rate based on secured lending.

There was one piece of good news, however – a legal expert said at a conference in the Hague that a change of benchmark was unlikely to lead to widespread and disruptive terminations of Libor-based contracts. Speaking at the same conference, senior FSB advisor Darrell Duffie said regulators will eventually have to push the market on to better reference rates if it didn't move by itself.

And research by Risk.net has found that hugely costly and embarrassing conduct scandals such as Libor-rigging and mis-selling have drawn far more management attention and resources to culture and conduct risk than before, in particular at major UK banks.

 

QUOTE OF THE WEEK – "This is all still very new – Sef trading is only a few years old, and I think that at this point our rules should allow for some variety. We'll see how practices develop [and] we'll see what the market wants" – CFTC chairman Timothy Massad


STAT OF THE WEEKEonia has gone through bouts of high volatility since at least 2010, but extremely low volumes in the underlying money markets – which have dropped as low as €7 billion ($7.6 billion) recently – now mean the fixing is barely meaningful. By comparison, average outstanding volumes in Eurex's GC Pooling repo market total €150 billion


ALSO THIS WEEK

MetLife puts forward alternative approach to G-Sii designation
NTNI definition could be dropped from G-Sii assessment and replaced by liquidity measures, says insurer

Liquidity stress test regime needs attention, say central bankers
DNB experts recommend improved market-wide and bank-specific liquidity stress tests

Banks hold advantage in clearing contract talks
Buy side losing battle with prospective clearing members

Massad: let market decide what it wants from Sefs
The market should decide whether it wants to trade via voice or electronic execution on Sefs, says CFTC chairman Timothy Massad

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here